Computing Stable Outcomes in Hedonic Games

نویسندگان

  • Martin Gairing
  • Rahul Savani
چکیده

We study the computational complexity of finding stable outcomes in symmetric additively-separable hedonic games. These coalition formation games are specified by an undirected edge-weighted graph: nodes are players, an outcome of the game is a partition of the nodes into coalitions, and the utility of a node is the sum of incident edge weights in the same coalition. We consider several natural stability requirements defined in the economics literature. For all of them the existence of a stable outcome is guaranteed by a potential function argument, so local improvements will converge to a stable outcome and all these problems are in PLS. The different stability requirements correspond to different local search neighbourhoods. For different neighbourhood structures, our findings comprise positive results in the form of polynomial-time algorithms for finding stable outcomes, and negative (PLS-completeness) results.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Computing stable outcomes in hedonic games with voting-based deviations

We study the computational complexity of finding stable outcomes in hedonic games, which are a class of coalition formation games. We restrict our attention to a nontrivial subclass of such games, which are guaranteed to possess stable outcomes, i.e., the set of symmetric additively-separable hedonic games. These games are specified by an undirected edge-weighted graph: nodes are players, an ou...

متن کامل

Computing stable outcomes in symmetric additively-separable hedonic games

We study the computational complexity of finding stable outcomes in hedonic games, which are a class of coalition formation games. We restrict our attention to symmetric additively-separable hedonic games, which are a nontrivial subclass of such games that are guaranteed to possess stable outcomes. These games are specified by an undirected edgeweighted graph: nodes are players, an outcome of t...

متن کامل

Individual-based stability in hedonic games depending on the best or worst players

We consider classes of hedonic games in which each player’s preferences over coalition structures are induced by the best player (Band B-hedonic games) or the worst player (Wand W-hedonic games) in his coalition. For these classes, which allow for concise representation, we analyze the computational complexity of deciding the existence of and computing individually stable, Nash stable, and indi...

متن کامل

Algorithms for Coalitional Games

Coalitional games are studied extensively in economics and computer science. They have recently shown to be a useful formalism and are applicable to a wide range of domains from electronic commerce to trade and negotiation systems. Key topics in coalitional games include both deciding the stability of given coalitions and calculating representative or all stable coalitions. However, typically t...

متن کامل

Price of Pareto Optimality in Hedonic Games

Price of Anarchy measures the welfare loss caused by selfish behavior: it is defined as the ratio of the social welfare in a socially optimal outcome and in a worst Nash equilibrium. A similar measure can be derived for other classes of stable outcomes. In this paper, we argue that Pareto optimality can be seen as a notion of stability, and introduce the concept of Price of Pareto Optimality: t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010